gms | German Medical Science

GMS Infectious Diseases

Paul-Ehrlich-Gesellschaft für Infektionstherapie e.V. (PEG) (PEG)

ISSN 2195-8831

COVID-19 treatment strategies with drugs centrally procured by the German Federal Ministry of Health in a representative tertiary care hospital: a temporal analysis

Original Article

  • Kathrin Marx - Hospital Pharmacy, St. Georg Hospital, Leipzig, Germany
  • Sven Kalbitz - Department of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, St. Georg Hospital, Leipzig, Germany
  • Nils Kellner - Department of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, St. Georg Hospital, Leipzig, Germany
  • Maike Fedders - Hospital Pharmacy, St. Georg Hospital, Leipzig, Germany
  • corresponding author Christoph Lübbert - Department of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, St. Georg Hospital, Leipzig, Germany; Division of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Department of Medicine I, Leipzig University Hospital, Leipzig, Germany; Interdisciplinary Center for Infectious Diseases, Leipzig University Hospital, Leipzig, Germany

GMS Infect Dis 2023;11:Doc03

doi: 10.3205/id000083, urn:nbn:de:0183-id0000831

Veröffentlicht: 28. September 2023

© 2023 Marx et al.
Dieser Artikel ist ein Open-Access-Artikel und steht unter den Lizenzbedingungen der Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (Namensnennung). Lizenz-Angaben siehe http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Abstract

Introduction: To ensure the fastest and earliest possible treatment, the German Federal Ministry of Health (BMG) initiated central procurement and nationwide distribution of new drugs against COVID-19. A single centre was used for a retrospective temporal analysis of this procedure.

Methods: A descriptive analysis of hospitalization and treatment of COVID-19 patients with drugs centrally procured by the BMG at St. Georg Hospital, Leipzig, Germany, for the period from 1 March 2020 to 28 February 2023 was employed considering the approval status, evolving guidelines and recommendations of medical societies.

Results: In total, 3,412 patients ≥18 years (54.9% men) with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection were admitted. The mean age was 64 years during the reporting period and 66.1/70.6 years during the first and second COVID-19 waves, respectively. 964 patients (28.2%) received COVID-19 therapy with drugs procured centrally by the BMG. Remdesivir was the most commonly used (63%). SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing monoclonal antibodies represented 23% of the therapies. Peroral antivirals (nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir) were used in 14% of COVID-19 patients, with molnupiravir being insignificant (five prescriptions).

Conclusions: Specific therapeutic approaches were mainly based on antiviral therapy in the early phase of COVID-19 to prevent severe disease progression in vulnerable patient groups. Most drugs had not been approved at the time of central procurement; therefore, prescriptions were given on a case-by-case basis after careful risk–benefit assessments. All available neutralizing monoclonal SARS-CoV-2 antibodies lost efficacy during the pandemic due to different circulating immune escape variants. Remdesivir and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir remained effective therapies in the early phase of COVID-19.

Keywords: SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, treatment, antiviral agents, monoclonal antibodies, variants of concern, pandemic waves


Introduction

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was first identified in December 2019 as the cause of a respiratory illness that developed in Wuhan (Hubei Province), China. The disease would thus be named coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Since the outbreak, the virus has spread worldwide rapidly, and the World Health Organization (WHO) declared COVID-19 a pandemic on 11 March 2020 [1]. By February 2023, 757 million COVID-19 cases and 6.85 million deaths had already been reported to the WHO worldwide [2]. On 27 January 2020, the first COVID-19 patient was diagnosed in Germany [3], and by 28 February 2023, more than 38 million people had contracted COVID-19, 894,000 people had been hospitalized and 167,951 people had died in Germany [4].

On 20 May 2020, the Federal Ministry of Health (BMG) issued an “Ordinance to ensure the supply of the population with products of medical need in the epidemic caused by the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2” (MedBVSV) to regulate the supply of urgently needed medicines and protective equipment as quickly as possible. Initially, 18 hospital pharmacies (star pharmacies) nationwide were designated as authorized agencies of the BMG in accordance with § 2 (1) and were charged with the storage, distribution and dispensation of the centrally procured medicines. According to § 3 (1), some regulations, including those of the German Medicines Act (AMG), did not apply to the appointed agencies. In particular, the provisions of § 43 (pharmacy obligation), § 47 (distribution channel), §§ 10, 11, 11a (labelling, package insert, expert information) and § 21 (authorization obligation) had to be applied [5]. To ensure the most uniform distribution of medicine possible, at the beginning of April 2021, the agencies commissioned by the BMG were expanded to include so-called ‘satellite pharmacies’ [6].

The centrally procured drugs included the direct antiviral agents remdesivir (Veklury), nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (Paxlovid), molnupiravir (Lagevrio) and the SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) bamlanivimab/etesevimab, casirivimab/imdevimab (Ronapreve), sotrovimab (Xevudy) and tixagevimab/cilgavimab (Evusheld). The procurement and distribution channels for centrally procured drugs have adapted to therapy requirements in the course of the pandemic [7].

The Robert Koch Institute (RKI) established the Standing Working Group of Competence and Treatment Centers for Diseases Caused by Highly Pathogenic Pathogens (STAKOB) in 2014, which cooperates closely with the German Paul Ehrlich Institute (PEI) and the Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM). Following the current scientific findings of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, this nationwide network of experts published a statement on COVID-19 therapy and diagnostics for the first time on 8 April 2020. The 26th update of the STAKOB statement was published on 8 February 2023 [8].

For a detailed understanding of the resulting treatment strategies in a representative hospital, a temporal investigation of the hospitalization and treatment of COVID-19 patients with the drugs centrally procured by the BMG was conducted at St. Georg Hospital, Leipzig. We focused on the temporal relationship between the provision and use of drugs in the context of the recommendations of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the resulting recommendations of professional societies. The aim of this analysis was to describe and classify the epidemiological development of hospitalization in the temporal context of the drugs procured centrally by the BMG, the recommendations of the EMA and specialist societies for targeted use, and the clinical implementation of the available therapy options.


Methods

Setting

St. Georg Hospital, Leipzig, Germany, is a tertiary care hospital with 1,066 plan beds and 25 different departments and clinics. Embedded in this structure is the Department of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine as a STAKOB Centre for the Free State of Saxony. COVID-19 patients were primarily treated in the two infectious disease wards with a total of 44 plan beds and special isolation conditions. As a star pharmacy, the hospital pharmacy organized the storage, distribution, dispensation and patient-related documentation of the COVID-19 drugs procured centrally by the BMG.

Study design and participants

In this retrospective study, only patients with polymerase chain reaction(PCR)-confirmed SARS-COV-2 infection were included. The study is limited to inpatients at St. Georg Hospital from 1 March 2020 to 28 February 2023. The following patient characteristics were recorded: age, sex, day of admission and discharge, length of stay, case mix index (CMI), discharge type and therapy with COVID-19 drugs centrally procured by the BMG.

Epidemiological phases

The COVID-19 pandemic was classified into individual epidemiological phases and waves of disease in accordance with the phase classification of the RKI [9]:

  • First wave (weeks 10–20, 2020), summer plateau 2020 (weeks 21–39)
  • Second wave (week 40, 2020–week 8, 2021)
  • Third wave (weeks 9–23, 2021), summer plateau 2021 (weeks 24–30)
  • Fourth wave (weeks 31–51, 2021)
  • Fifth wave (week 52, 2021–week 21, 2022)
  • Sixth wave (week 22, 2022 onward)

During the pandemic, several SARS-CoV-2 variants were classified as variants of concern (VOCs). In particular, the proportion of dominant circulating VOCs was used to delineate the waves: Alpha for the third, Delta for the fourth, Omicron BA.1/BA.2 for the fifth and Omicron subline BA.5 for the sixth wave [9].

Statistical analysis

Data analysis was based on descriptive statistics. The chi-square test was used for categorical variables, and the t-test was used for continuous variables to provide information on the totality of the data collection. Statistical analyses were performed using R statistical software (version 4.2.1).


Results

Patients

Within our three-year observation period, 3,412 patients suffering from COVID-19 with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection were hospitalized at St. Georg Hospital. Of these, 1,874 patients (54.9%) were men. The first COVID-19 patient was hospitalized at St. Georg Hospital on 6 March 2020. The respective absolute and relative number of patients between the first and sixth waves were as follows: first: 83 (2.4%), second: 627 (18.4%), third: 390 (11.4%), fourth: 433 (12.7%), fifth: 795 (23.3%), and sixth: 1,036 (30.4%). The clinical and demographic patient characteristics of the 3,412 cases according to the wave classification [9] are summarized in Table 1 [Tab. 1].

During the summer plateaus of 2020 and 2021, only individual cases were hospitalized. This finding aligns with a decline in the epidemiological infection rate. The average age of hospitalized patients was 64 years, with significantly higher ages during the first (66.1 years) and second (70.6 years) waves. In the second and sixth waves, the proportion of patients aged ≥80 years was 39.4% and 37.1%, respectively. The proportion of patients aged <18 years increased to 10.5% during the pandemic in the sixth wave.

Application of drug therapy for COVID-19

A total of 964 (28.2%) adult patients (≥18 years) received therapy with COVID-19 drugs centrally procured by the BMG. The proportion was highest (40%) in the third wave. Twenty-four (12.4%) patients aged 18 to 34 years, 160 (26.9%) patients aged 35 to 59 years, 449 (36.7%) patients aged 60 to 79 years, and 331 (29.8%) patients aged ≥80 years received specific drug COVID-19 therapy. 107 (11.1%) patients died despite this specific therapy, of whom 100 (93.5%) were aged ≥60 years. Patients in the <18 years group did not receive COVID-19 drug therapy. Figure 1 [Fig. 1] summarizes the distribution of patients among age groups and COVID-19 drug therapy.

Remdesivir was the most commonly used drug, accounting for 63% of therapies. The SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing mAbs bamlanivimab/etesevimab, casirivimab/imdevimab, sotrovimab and tixagevimab/cilgavimab accounted for 23% of therapies. The peroral antiviral agents nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir were used in 14% of patients receiving therapy, with molnuparivir having no clinical significance (five prescriptions). Information on mortality, length of stay, and disease severity (CMI) was summarized for the clinical evaluation of antiviral therapies in Table 2 [Tab. 2]. Only agents with meaningful case numbers (remdesivir, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, casirivimab/imdevimab, and sotrovimab) were evaluated. The weekly course of infections and prescriptions at St. Georg Hospital is described in Figure 2 [Fig. 2].


Discussion

The therapeutic approaches of the drugs centrally procured by the BMG were primarily based on antiviral therapy to avoid severe clinical courses. Nationwide, the direct antiviral agents remdesivir, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, molnupiravir and the SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing mAbs bamlanivimab/etesevimab, casirivimab/imdevimab, sotrovimab and tixagevimab/cilgavimab were distributed. Most (71%) had not yet been approved for use in COVID-19 therapy during the initial centralized procurement. They were prescribed case-by-case for individual therapeutic trials and under careful benefit–risk consideration. Due to evolving study results, STAKOB’s evidence-based recommendations for action in the management of COVID-19 were regularly updated. The data were referenced to the main recommendations of the EMA and the time of the BMG’s central procurement of COVID-19 drugs.

Remdesivir (Veklury) was made available to St. Georg Hospital on 15 May 2020. This was followed by individual prescriptions as part of an individual cure trial. On 3 July 2020, remdesivir received conditional approval from the EMA based on the NIAID-ACTT-1 trial [10]. It was the first antiviral drug for COVID-19-affected adults and adolescents with pneumonia and supplemental oxygen requirements. With the COVID-19 guideline update on 20 November 2020, the WHO spoke out against the application of remdesivir [11] based on the interim results of the SOLIDARITY study [12] and a meta-analysis of data from all controlled trials. After the final evaluation and considering the WHO’s opinion, on 10 December 2020 the EMA implemented a restriction of the indication for remdesivir for patients with low-flow oxygen supplementation, high-flow oxygen supplementation or other non-invasive forms of ventilation [13]. Due to ongoing uncertainties regarding remdesivir’s benefits, the European Respiratory Society (ERS) and the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF) did not advocate for or against remdesivir in their treatment guidelines [14], [15], [16]. Thus, uncertainties arose in prescribing remdesivir at St. Georg Hospital, resulting in its stagnant use in the second wave. By week 10 of 2021, case numbers and remdesivir therapy increased again, peaking in the third wave. During this wave 35.4% of patients (n=138) received remdesivir.

The third wave was particularly related to the emerging VOC Alpha, which had a higher replication rate [17]. Thus, the federal government extended federal lockdown measures, which resulted in consistently reduced infection rates across all states [18]. These lockdown measures and the vaccination of the particularly at-risk groups against SARS-CoV-2 have resulted in the containment of the rising infection rates in the third wave. As a result, this led to a reduction in the hospitalization rate of the most at-risk group. The average age of COVID-19 patients hospitalized at St. George Hospital decreased to 63 years. The proportion of those over 80 years of age decreased from 39% (second wave) to 23.6% (third wave). In December 2021, following the PINETREE study, the use of early therapy (within seven days of symptom onset) was ex-panded to patients with risk factors for a severe course [19]. Because remdesivir retained antiviral activ-ity in in vitro testing against the VOCs Alpha, Delta and Omicron with the BA.1/BA.2/BA.5 sublines [20], it was used at a rate of 63% throughout the pandemic. 69 (11.4%) patients died during remdesivir therapy. A recent meta-analysis on the effects of remdesivir in hospitalized COVID-19 patients summarized all-cause mortality at day 28 as the primary outcome of eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (10,480 patients) [21]. 12.5% of patients in the remdesivir group died by day 28, compared with 14.1% in the no remdesivir group (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.88; 95% CI 0.78–1.00; p=0.045) [21]. In a separate retrospective analysis of SARS-CoV-2 patients admitted to St. Georg Hospital between 1 July 2021 and 30 June 2022, a significant reduction in 28-day mortality was confirmed in patients receiving remdesivir therapy [22].

The nationwide distribution of the SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing mAbs bamlavinimab and casirivimab/imdevimab began on 18 January 2021. The mAb combination casirivimab/imdevimab received EMA recommendations based on the REGN_COV-2 trial [23], [24] on 26 February 2021 [25]. The mAb combination bamlanivimab/etesevimab received an EMA recommendation based on the BLAZE-1 trial [26] on 5 March 2021 [27] for use in the EU. Both antibody therapies were indicated in adult COVID-19 patients who did not require oxygen and were not at increased risk for severe progression [28]. Notably, mAb bamlanivimab was used at St. Georg Hospital only in the third wave in three patients as a single-case decision. For the mAb combination bamlanivimab/etesevimab, the EMA halted the rolling review process on 2 November 2021 after the manufacturer (Eli Lilly) withdrew its marketing authorization application. The mAb combination casirivimab/imdevimab received European approval on 12 November 2021 as Ronapreve. With approval, casirivimab/imdevimab therapy also increased to 69 patients (60% of treated cases) in the fourth wave. The fifth wave was increasingly characterized by circulating VOC Omicron as the dominant variant, which caused a loss of efficacy of this mAb combination. It was only used at St. Georg Hospital at the beginning of the fifth wave, with 22 applications. A total of 111 patients received the mAb combination casirivimab/imdevimab, of whom 14 patients (12.6%) died. In the RECOVERY RCT, there was no significant difference in the primary endpoint of 28-day mortality between the casirivimab/imdevimab and standard treatment groups: 943 (19%) of 4,839 patients in the casirivimab/imdevimab groups died versus 1,029 (21%) of 4,946 patients in the standard treatment group (RR 0.94; 95% CI 0.86–1.02; p=0.14) [29]. The ninth week of 2022 saw the Omicron subline BA.2 become the predominant variant in Germany [9]. Subsequently, further use was no longer recommended in therapy or preexposure prophylaxis.

As of 17 December 2021, sotrovimab (Xevudy) was approved in the EU for adults and adolescents. Based on the COMET-ICE study [30], it was applied in cases not requiring oxygen supplementation but at increased risk for severe disease progression [30]. The first distribution of the contingents procured by the BMG to star pharmacies occurred on 18 January 2022. Sotrovimab was used in the fifth wave on 91 inpatients (35% of treated cases) at St. Georg Hospital. It demonstrated no change in antiviral activity in the Omicron subline BA.1 and a 15.7-fold reduction in BA.2. In the sixth wave (BA.5), sensitivity decreased by a factor of 21.6 [31]. At the beginning of the sixth wave, Sotrovimab was administered in double doses (1,000 mg) for only six patients at St. Georg Hospital [8]. A total of 97 patients received the mAb sotrovimab therapy, of whom 12 patients (12.4%) died. The mean CMI was significantly higher in deceased patients (4.57) than in convalescent patients (1.47). A significant difference was also found in length of stay: 38.5 days in deceased patients versus 13.7 days in convalescents. A systematic review and meta-analysis of 27,429 patients from 17 studies found a significant difference in mortality rates (OR=0.40, 95% CI 0.25–0.63; p<0.001) [32]. In a descriptive retrospective study of adult high-risk patients treated with sotrovimab, a mortality rate of 0.4% was observed. However, this study focused on outpatients, of whom 74 patients (2%) were hospitalized and of whom 9 patients (12.2%) died [33].

The central distribution of tixagevimab/cilgavimab (Evusheld) began on 18 February 2022. EMA approval was based on the PROVENT clinical trial [34] on 24 March 2022 [35]. Only 12 inpatients received preexposure prophylaxis at St. Georg Hospital. Based on the TACKLE study [36], an EMA approval extension [37] was granted on 15 September 2022. The extension included the treatment of COVID-19 disease for adults and adolescents who did not require supplemental oxygen and were at an increased risk for a severe course of COVID-19. This mAb combination was effective in vitro against Omicron sublines BA.1, BA.2 and BA.4/BA.5 with varying degrees of reduction in neutralizing capacity [38]. Currently, the efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing monoclonal antibodies available in Germany is considered insufficient to justify monotherapy in the currently predominant sublineage of the Omicron variant [8].

The EMA published a recommendation on the use of molnupiravir (Lagevrio) on 19 November 2021 based on the MOVeOUT trial [39], [40]. It became available to all pharmacies nationwide on 3 January 2022 via distribution by pharmaceutical wholesalers (PHARGO). Molnupiravir was used at St. Georg Hospital in the sixth wave in only five patients as a single-case decision. Based on data available from February 2023, the EMA was unable to determine whether the use of molnupiravir can reduce the risk of hospitalization or death or shorten the time to recovery. With the rejection of the marketing authorization application, the basis for marketing under the MedBVSV ceased to apply on 24 February 2023 [41].

On 28 January 2022, the EMA granted conditional approval of the oral antiviral drug combination nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (Paxlovid) for the treatment of symptomatic, nonhospitalized COVID-19 patients without supplemental oxygen requirements and an increased risk of severe disease progression [42]. The approval was based on an interim analysis of the EPIC-HR study [43]. As of 25 February 2022, the drug was available nationwide via distribution by PHAGRO. Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir was the second most commonly used COVID-19 drug at St. Georg Hospital in the sixth wave, with 128 therapy units (42%). A total of 10 (7.8%) patients died during nirmatrelvir/ritonavir therapy. The mean CMI was significantly higher at 2.86 in deceased patients versus 1.40 in recovered patients (p=0.013). In a retrospective cohort study from Hong Kong, all-cause mortality was 3.6% in hospitalized patients with Omicron BA.2 infections receiving nirmatrelvir/ritonavir therapy [44]. The use of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir was associated with a significantly lower risk of death (HR 0.34, 95% CI 0.23–0.50; p<0.001) [44]. A systematic review with meta-analysis including 314,353 patients from 23 different studies found a significant difference in mortality as well (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.14–0.45; p<0.001) [45]. Nirmatrelvir retained antiviral activity in in vitro assays against the variants of concern: Alpha, Delta and Omicron, with sublines BA.1/BA.2/BA.4/BA.5 [46]. Currently, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir is the drug of choice for adult COVID-19 patients who do not require supplemental oxygen and are at an increased risk of developing a severe course of COVID-19. Therapy should be initiated within the first five days of symptom onset or within five days of suspected infection [8].

Since the currently predominant SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant sublines are associated with a lower risk of hospitalization and the proportion of severe illnesses and deaths is lower than in earlier waves, the RKI estimates the current overall risk from COVID-19 to be moderate [47]. Therefore, the BMG is not seeking further central procurement of COVID-19 drugs.

Lessons learned

The possibility of rapid and early treatment of COVID-19 patients was successfully organized through central procurement of antiviral drugs and their nationwide distribution through the star and satellite pharmacies. However, without EMA approval, these drugs could only be prescribed as a case-by-case decision in the context of an individual treatment trial. EMA approval decisions were a prerequisite for the widespread clinical use of COVID-19 drugs.

All of the neutralizing SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies made available rapidly lost efficacy during the pandemic because of the different variants circulating. In clinical trials the direct antiviral drugs remdesivir (Veklury) and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (Paxlovid) were shown to be effective therapeutic agents in the early phase of COVID-19 and were successfully incorporated into clinical treatment strategies. They retained antiviral activity against all eligible SARS-CoV-2 variants.

Under optimal treatment conditions, integrating a star pharmacy and a STAKOB center in a hospital, COVID-19 drug therapy was shown to have a positive impact on all-cause mortality in critically ill hospitalized patients.


Notes

Ethics approval

The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical guidelines of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments and was approved by the local ethics committee (Saxonian Board of Physicians, Dresden, Germany, vote EK-BR-65/21–1).

Authors’ contributions

K.M., M.F. and C.L. participated in the study conception and design. K.M. and S.K. were responsible for the acquisition of data from the study participants. K.M., S.K., N.K., M.F. and C.L. analyzed the data. K.M. performed the statistical analysis. K.M. and C.L. wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final version to be published.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.


References

1.
World Health Organization (WHO). WHO Director-General's opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19. 2020 Mar 1 [last accessed 2023 Mar 28]. Available from: https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19---11-march-2020 Externer Link
2.
World Health Organization (WHO). WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard. [last accessed 2023 Mar 28]. Available from: https://covid19.who.int/ Externer Link
3.
Bayerisches Landesamt für Gesundheit und Lebensmittelsicherheit. Beschreibung des bisherigen Ausbruchsgeschehens mit dem neuartigen Coronavirus SARS-CoV 2 in Deutschland (Stand: 12. Februar 2020). Epid Bull. 2020;7:3-4.
4.
Robert Koch-Institut (RKI). COVID-19: Fallzahlen in Deutschland und weltweit. [last accessed 2023 28 Mar]. Available from: https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/InfAZ/N/Neuartiges_Coronavirus/Fallzahlen.html
5.
Bundesministerium für Gesundheit (BMG). Verordnung zur Sicherstellung der Versorgung der Bevölkerung mit Produkten des medizinischen Bedarfs bei der durch das Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 verursachten Epidemie (Medizinischer Bedarf Versorgungssicherstellungsverordnung – MedBVSV). [last accessed 2023 Mar 28]. Available from: https://www.bundesgesundheitsministerium.de/service/gesetze-und-verordnungen/guv-19-lp/medbvsv.html Externer Link
6.
Robert Koch-Institut (RKI). Liste der Stern- und Satellitenapotheken (beauftragte Stellen nach $ 2 Absatz 1 MedBVSV). [last accessed 2023 Mar 28]. Available from: https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/InfAZ/N/Neuartiges_Coronavirus/Therapie/Stern-Satellitenapotheken.pdf
7.
Bundesministerium für Gesundheit (BMG). Bekanntmachung der Allgemeinverfügung zum Bezug und zur Anwendung monoklonaler Antikörper und zum Bezug und zur Abgabe antiviraler, oral einzunehmender Arzneimittel gegen COVID-19 vom 4. Januar 2022. 2022 [last accessed 2023 Mar 28]. Available from: https://www.bundesanzeiger.de/pub/publication/yKdCDkGe0Cb1Lj1A2J2/content/yKdCDkGe0Cb1Lj1A2J2/BAnz%20AT%2014.01.2022%20B2.pdf?inline Externer Link
8.
Ständiger Arbeitskreis der Kompetenz- und Behandlungszentren für Krankheiten durch hochpathogene Erreger am Robert Koch-Institut (STAKOB). Hinweise zu Erkennung, Diagnostik und Therapie von Patienten mit COVID-19. [last accessed 2023 Mar 28]. Available from: https://www.rki.de/covid-19-therapie-stakob Externer Link
9.
Tolksdorf K, Loenenbach A, Buda S. Dritte Aktualisierung der „Retrospektiven Phaseneinteilung der COVID-19-Pandemie in Deutschland“. Epid Bull. 2022;38:3-6.
10.
Beigel JH, Tomashek KM, Dodd LE, Mehta AK, Zingman BS, Kalil AC, Hohmann E, Chu HY, Luetkemeyer A, Kline S, Lopez de Castilla D, Finberg RW, Dierberg K, Tapson V, Hsieh L, Patterson TF, Paredes R, Sweeney DA, Short WR, Touloumi G, Lye DC, Ohmagari N, Oh MD, Ruiz-Palacios GM, Benfield T, Fätkenheuer G, Kortepeter MG, Atmar RL, Creech CB, Lundgren J, Babiker AG, Pett S, Neaton JD, Burgess TH, Bonnett T, Green M, Makowski M, Osinusi A, Nayak S, Lane HC; ACTT-1 Study Group Members. Remdesivir for the Treatment of Covid-19 - Final Report. N Engl J Med. 2020 Nov 5;383(19):1813-26. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2007764 Externer Link
11.
World Health Organization (WHO). Therapeutics and COVID-19: living guideline. 2022 [last accessed 2023 Mar 28]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-2019-nCoV-therapeutics-2022.1 Externer Link
12.
WHO Solidarity Trial Consortium, Pan H, Peto R, Henao-Restrepo AM, Preziosi MP, Sathiyamoorthy V, Abdool Karim Q, Alejandria MM, Hernández García C, Kieny MP, Malekzadeh R, Murthy S, Reddy KS, Roses Periago M, Abi Hanna P, Ader F, Al-Bader AM, Alhasawi A, Allum E, Alotaibi A, Alvarez-Moreno CA, Appadoo S, Asiri A, Aukrust P, Barratt-Due A, Bellani S, Branca M, Cappel-Porter HBC, Cerrato N, Chow TS, Como N, Eustace J, García PJ, Godbole S, Gotuzzo E, Griskevicius L, Hamra R, Hassan M, Hassany M, Hutton D, Irmansyah I, Jancoriene L, Kirwan J, Kumar S, Lennon P, Lopardo G, Lydon P, Magrini N, Maguire T, Manevska S, Manuel O, McGinty S, Medina MT, Mesa Rubio ML, Miranda-Montoya MC, Nel J, Nunes EP, Perola M, Portolés A, Rasmin MR, Raza A, Rees H, Reges PPS, Rogers CA, Salami K, Salvadori MI, Sinani N, Sterne JAC, Stevanovikj M, Tacconelli E, Tikkinen KAO, Trelle S, Zaid H, Røttingen JA, Swaminathan S. Repurposed Antiviral Drugs for Covid-19 - Interim WHO Solidarity Trial Results. N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 11;384(6):497-511. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2023184 Externer Link
13.
European Medicines Agency (EMA). CHMP post-authorisation summary of positive opinion for Veklury (II-12). 2020 Dec 10 [last accessed 2023 Mar 28]. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/smop/chmp-post-authorisation-summary-positive-opinion-veklury-ii-12_en.pdf Externer Link
14.
Chalmers JD, Crichton ML, Goeminne PC, Cao B, Humbert M, Shteinberg M, Antoniou KM, Ulrik CS, Parks H, Wang C, Vandendriessche T, Qu J, Stolz D, Brightling C, Welte T, Aliberti S, Simonds AK, Tonia T, Roche N. Management of hospitalised adults with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a European Respiratory Society living guideline. Eur Respir J. 2021 Apr 15;57(4):2100048. DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00048-2021 Externer Link
15.
Malin JJ, Spinner CD, Janssens U, Welte T, Weber-Carstens S, Schälte G, Gastmeier P, Langer F, Wepler M, Westhoff M, Pfeifer M, Rabe KF, Hoffmann F, Böttiger BW, Weinmann-Menke J, Kersten A, Berlit P, Krawczyk M, Nehls W, Fichtner F, Laudi S, Stegemann M, Skoetz N, Nothacker M, Marx G, Karagiannidis C, Kluge S. Key summary of German national treatment guidance for hospitalized COVID-19 patients: Key pharmacologic recommendations from a national German living guideline using an Evidence to Decision Framework. Infection. 2022 Feb;50(1):93-106. DOI: 10.1007/s15010-021-01645-2 Externer Link
16.
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internistische Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin (DGIIN); Deutsche Interdisziplinäre Vereinigung für Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin (DIVI); Deutsche Gesellschaft für Pneumologie und Beatmungsmedizin (DGP); Deutsche Gesellschaft für Infektiologie (DGI), et al. S3-Leitlinie Empfehlungen zur stationären Therapie von Patienten mit COVID-19. AWMF-Registernummer 113-001. Update 2023. Langfassung. AWMF; 2023. Available from: https://register.awmf.org/de/leitlinien/detail/113-001LG Externer Link
17.
Robert Koch-Institut (RKI). Übersicht zu besorgniserregenden SARS-CoV-2-Virusvarianten (VOC). [last accessed 2023 Mar 28]. Available from: https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/InfAZ/N/Neuartiges_Coronavirus/Virusvariante.html
18.
Schuppert A, Polotzek K, Karschau J, Karagiannidis C. Effectiveness of extended shutdown measures during the ´Bundesnotbremse´ introduced in the third SARS-CoV-2 wave in Germany. Infection. 2021 Dec;49(6):1331-5. DOI: 10.1007/s15010-021-01713-7 Externer Link
19.
Gottlieb RL, Vaca CE, Paredes R, Mera J, Webb BJ, Perez G, Oguchi G, Ryan P, Nielsen BU, Brown M, Hidalgo A, Sachdeva Y, Mittal S, Osiyemi O, Skarbinski J, Juneja K, Hyland RH, Osinusi A, Chen S, Camus G, Abdelghany M, Davies S, Behenna-Renton N, Duff F, Marty FM, Katz MJ, Ginde AA, Brown SM, Schiffer JT, Hill JA; GS-US-540-9012 (PINETREE) Investigators. Early Remdesivir to Prevent Progression to Severe Covid-19 in Outpatients. N Engl J Med. 2022 Jan 27;386(4):305-15. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2116846 Externer Link
20.
European Medicines Agency (EMA). Veklury: Summary of Product Characteristics. [last accessed 2023 Mar 28]. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/veklury-epar-product-information_en.pdf Externer Link
21.
Amstutz A, Speich B, Mentré F, Rueegg CS, Belhadi D, Assoumou L, Burdet C, Murthy S, Dodd LE, Wang Y, Tikkinen KAO, Ader F, Hites M, Bouscambert M, Trabaud MA, Fralick M, Lee TC, Pinto R, Barratt-Due A, Lund-Johansen F, Müller F, Nevalainen OPO, Cao B, Bonnett T, Griessbach A, Taji Heravi A, Schönenberger C, Janiaud P, Werlen L, Aghlmandi S, Schandelmaier S, Yazdanpanah Y, Costagliola D, Olsen IC, Briel M. Effects of remdesivir in patients hospitalised with COVID-19: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Lancet Respir Med. 2023 May;11(5):453-64. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(22)00528-8 Externer Link
22.
Marx K, Gončarova K, Fedders D, Kalbitz S, Kellner N, Fedders M, Lübbert C. Clinical outcomes of hospitalized COVID-19 patients treated with remdesivir: a retrospective analysis of a large tertiary care center in Germany. Infection. 2023 Feb;51(1):97-108. DOI: 10.1007/s15010-022-01841-8 Externer Link
23.
Weinreich DM, Sivapalasingam S, Norton T, Ali S, Gao H, Bhore R, Musser BJ, Soo Y, Rofail D, Im J, Perry C, Pan C, Hosain R, Mahmood A, Davis JD, Turner KC, Hooper AT, Hamilton JD, Baum A, Kyratsous CA, Kim Y, Cook A, Kampman W, Kohli A, Sachdeva Y, Graber X, Kowal B, DiCioccio T, Stahl N, Lipsich L, Braunstein N, Herman G, Yancopoulos GD; Trial Investigators. REGN-COV2, a Neutralizing Antibody Cocktail, in Outpatients with Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2021 Jan 21;384(3):238-51. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2035002 Externer Link
24.
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. REGEN-COV™ (casirivimab and imdevimab) phase 3 RECOVERY trial meets primary outcome, improving survival in hospitalized COVID-19 patients lacking an immune response to SARS-CoV-2. 2021 Jun 16 [last accessed 2023 Mar 28]. Available from: https://investor.regeneron.com/news-releases/news-release-details/regen-covtm-casirivimab-and-imdevimab-phase-3-recovery-trial/ Externer Link
25.
European Medicines Agency (EMA). EMA issues advice on use of REGN-COV2 antibody combination (casirivimab/imdevimab). 2021 Feb 26 [last accessed 2023 Mar 28]. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/news/ema-issues-advice-use-regn-cov2-antibody-combination-casirivimab-imdevimab Externer Link
26.
Gottlieb RL, Nirula A, Chen P, Boscia J, Heller B, Morris J, Huhn G, Cardona J, Mocherla B, Stosor V, Shawa I, Kumar P, Adams AC, Van Naarden J, Custer KL, Durante M, Oakley G, Schade AE, Holzer TR, Ebert PJ, Higgs RE, Kallewaard NL, Sabo J, Patel DR, Klekotka P, Shen L, Skovronsky DM. Effect of Bamlanivimab as Monotherapy or in Combination With Etesevimab on Viral Load in Patients With Mild to Moderate COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2021 Feb 16;325(7):632-44. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2021.0202 Externer Link
27.
European Medicines Agency (EMA). EMA starts rolling review of Eli Lilly antibodies bamlanivimab and etesevimab for COVID-19. 2021 Mar 11 [last accessed 2023 Mar 28]. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/news/ema-starts-rolling-review-eli-lilly-antibodies-bamlanivimab-etesevimab-covid-19 Externer Link
28.
Ständiger Arbeitskreis der Kompetenz- und Behandlungszentren für Krankheiten durch hochpathogene Erreger am Robert Koch-Institut (STAKOB). Hinweise zu Erkennung, Diagnostik und Therapie von Patienten mit COVID-19 - Stand 28. April 2021. [last accessed 2023 Mar 28]. Available from: https://www.rki.de/covid-19-therapie-stakob Externer Link
29.
RECOVERY Collaborative Group. Casirivimab and imdevimab in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 (RECOVERY): a randomised, controlled, open-label, platform trial. Lancet. 2022 Feb 12;399(10325):665-76. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00163-5 Externer Link
30.
Gupta A, Gonzalez-Rojas Y, Juarez E, Crespo Casal M, Moya J, Falci DR, Sarkis E, Solis J, Zheng H, Scott N, Cathcart AL, Hebner CM, Sager J, Mogalian E, Tipple C, Peppercorn A, Alexander E, Pang PS, Free A, Brinson C, Aldinger M, Shapiro AE; COMET-ICE Investigators. Early Treatment for Covid-19 with SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Antibody Sotrovimab. N Engl J Med. 2021 Nov 18;385(21):1941-50. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2107934 Externer Link
31.
European Medicines Agency (EMA). Xevudy: Summary of Product characteristics. [last accessed 2023 Mar 28]. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/xevudy-epar-product-information_en.pdf Externer Link
32.
Amani B, Amani B. Efficacy and safety of sotrovimab in patients with COVID-19: A rapid review and meta-analysis. Rev Med Virol. 2022 Nov;32(6):e2402. DOI: 10.1002/rmv.2402 Externer Link
33.
Razonable RR, Tulledge-Scheitel SM, Hanson SN, Arndt RF, Speicher LL, Seville TA, Larsen JJ, Ganesh R, O'Horo JC. Real-world Clinical Outcomes of Bebtelovimab and Sotrovimab Treatment of High-risk Persons With Coronavirus Disease 2019 During the Omicron Epoch. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022 Oct 6;9(10):ofac411. DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofac411 Externer Link
34.
Levin MJ, Ustianowski A, De Wit S, Launay O, Avila M, Templeton A, Yuan Y, Seegobin S, Ellery A, Levinson DJ, Ambery P, Arends RH, Beavon R, Dey K, Garbes P, Kelly EJ, Koh GCKW, Near KA, Padilla KW, Psachoulia K, Sharbaugh A, Streicher K, Pangalos MN, Esser MT; PROVENT Study Group. Intramuscular AZD7442 (Tixagevimab-Cilgavimab) for Prevention of Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2022 Jun 9;386(23):2188-200. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2116620 Externer Link
35.
European Medicines Agency (EMA). CHMP: Summary of Opinion for Evusheld. 2022 [last accessed 2023 Mar 28]. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/evusheld Externer Link
36.
Montgomery H, Hobbs FDR, Padilla F, Arbetter D, Templeton A, Seegobin S, Kim K, Campos JAS, Arends RH, Brodek BH, Brooks D, Garbes P, Jimenez J, Koh GCKW, Padilla KW, Streicher K, Viani RM, Alagappan V, Pangalos MN, Esser MT; TACKLE study group. Efficacy and safety of intramuscular administration of tixagevimab-cilgavimab for early outpatient treatment of COVID-19 (TACKLE): a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2022 Oct;10(10):985-96. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(22)00180-1 Externer Link
37.
European Medicines Agency (EMA). CHMP: Post-authorisation summary positive opinion for evusheld (II-01). 2022 Sep 15 [last accessed 2023 Mar 28]. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/smop/chmp-post-authorisation-summary-positive-opinion-evusheld-ii-01_en.pdf Externer Link
38.
European Medicines Agency (EMA). Evusheld: Summary of Product Characteristics. 2022 [last accessed 2023 Mar 28]. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/evusheld Externer Link
39.
Jayk Bernal A, Gomes da Silva MM, Musungaie DB, Kovalchuk E, Gonzalez A, Delos Reyes V, Martín-Quirós A, Caraco Y, Williams-Diaz A, Brown ML, Du J, Pedley A, Assaid C, Strizki J, Grobler JA, Shamsuddin HH, Tipping R, Wan H, Paschke A, Butterton JR, Johnson MG, De Anda C; MOVe-OUT Study Group. Molnupiravir for Oral Treatment of Covid-19 in Nonhospitalized Patients. N Engl J Med. 2022 Feb 10;386(6):509-20. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2116044 Externer Link
40.
Caraco Y, Crofoot GE, Moncada PA, Galustyan AN, Musungaie DB, Payne B, Kovalchuk E, Gonzalez A, Brown ML, Williams-Diaz A, Gao W, Strizki JM, Grobler J, Du J, Assaid CA, Paschke A, Butterton JF, Johnson MG, de Anda C; Pharm.D., for the MOVe-OUT Study Group. Phase 2/3 Trial of Molnupiravir for Treatment of Covid-19 in Nonhospitalized Adults. NEJM Evid 2022;1(2). DOI: 10.1056/EVIDoa2100043 Externer Link
41.
European Medicines Agency (EMA). Refusal of the marketing authorisation for Lagevrio (molnupiravir). 2023 [last accessed 2023 Mar 28]. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/smop-initial/questions-answers-refusal-marketing-authorisation-lagevrio-molnupiravir_en.pdf Externer Link
42.
European Medicines Agency (EMA). EMA recommends conditional marketing authorisation for Paxlovid. 2022 Jan 27 [last accessed 2023 Mar 28]. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/news/covid-19-ema-recommends-conditional-marketing-authorisation-paxlovid Externer Link
43.
Hammond J, Leister-Tebbe H, Gardner A, Abreu P, Bao W, Wisemandle W, Baniecki M, Hendrick VM, Damle B, Simón-Campos A, Pypstra R, Rusnak JM; EPIC-HR Investigators. Oral Nirmatrelvir for High-Risk, Nonhospitalized Adults with Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2022 Apr 14;386(15):1397-408. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2118542 Externer Link
44.
Wong CKH, Au ICH, Lau KTK, Lau EHY, Cowling BJ, Leung GM. Real-world effectiveness of early molnupiravir or nirmatrelvir-ritonavir in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 without supplemental oxygen requirement on admission during Hong Kong's omicron BA.2 wave: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 Dec;22(12):1681-93. DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00507-2 Externer Link
45.
Amani B, Amani B. Efficacy and safety of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (Paxlovid) for COVID-19: A rapid review and meta-analysis. J Med Virol. 2023 Feb;95(2):e28441. DOI: 10.1002/jmv.28441 Externer Link
46.
European Medicines Agency (EMA). Paxlovid: Summary of Product Characteristics. [last accessed 2023 Mar 28]. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/paxlovid-epar-product-information_en.pdf Externer Link
47.
Robert Koch-Institut (RKI). Risikobewertung zu COVID-19. [last accessed 2023 Mar 28]. Available from: https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/InfAZ/N/Neuartiges_Coronavirus/Risikobewertung.html